Speaker summary
51% 1 analyzed article/video 452.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diego Rodriguez results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Anchoring Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 109 hits . Analysis detected 593.684 faulty-reasoning hits from 452.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 5% (41,001 of 42,763 speakers). This Diego Rodriguez is better (less manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group. Diego Rodriguez
Speaker details
Total words: 452.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.1% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos452.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 16.7% 16.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% No True Scotsman: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst