Speaker summary
51%1 analyzed article/video452.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diego Rodriguez results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 593.684 faulty-reasoning hits from 452.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 5% (41,001 of 42,763 speakers). This Diego Rodriguez is better (less manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group.
Diego Rodriguez
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
5%Diego Rodriguez (selected)6%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 452.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751004.1% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos452.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.4%3.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 7.8%7.8%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%No True Scotsman: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos