Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video40.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deondra Holzendorf results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Hasty Generalization, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 55.9% saturation with 19 hits. Analysis detected 53 faulty-reasoning hits from 40.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 52% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (11,789 of 45,128 speakers). This Deondra Holzendorf is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Deondra Holzendorf
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠74%Deondra Holzendorf (selected)52%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 40.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.9% percentile
52.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos40.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 55.9%55.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 55.9%55.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 44.1%44.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 55.9%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 55.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 44.1%, sitewide 8.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos