Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video53.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dean Lomax results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 120 faulty-reasoning hits from 53.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (12,830 of 45,145 speakers). This Dean Lomax is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Dean Lomax
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠72%Dean Lomax (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 53.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.6% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos53.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos