Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video109.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Kaminsky results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Burden of Proof, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 46.4% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 444.892 faulty-reasoning hits from 109.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (19,755 of 45,144 speakers). This David Kaminsky is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
David Kaminsky
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠57%David Kaminsky (selected)36%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 109.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.2% percentile
35.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos109.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 70.3%70.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 46.4%46.4%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 12.6%12.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 70.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 46.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 0.4%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 0.1%Horn Effect: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos