Speaker summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darren Houk results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 61.5% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 48 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 46.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (16,020 of 45,529 speakers). This Darren Houk is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Darren Houk
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠65%Darren Houk (selected)47%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510064.8% percentile
46.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 61.5%61.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 30.8%30.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 61.5%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 3.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos