Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video115.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cynthia Powers results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hindsight Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 57.5% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 213.495 faulty-reasoning hits from 115.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (22,634 of 44,616 speakers). This Cynthia Powers is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Cynthia Powers
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠50%Cynthia Powers (selected)30%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 115.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.3% percentile
29.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos115.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 57.5%57.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 35.5%35.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 57.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 35.5%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 1.4%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos