Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video44 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CSDE spokesperson results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) and Status Quo Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 63.6% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 44 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 54.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (11,421 of 45,684 speakers). This CSDE spokesperson is worse (more manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
CSDE spokesperson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠75%CSDE spokesperson (selected)55%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 44
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.0% percentile
54.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos44 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 63.6%63.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 63.6%63.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 36.4%36.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 63.6%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 63.6%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 36.4%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos