Speaker summary
48% 16 analyzed articles/videos 1,708 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cori Bush results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Anecdotal , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 221.569 hits . Analysis detected 1,412.086 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,708 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 1% (44,153 of 44,457 speakers). This Cori Bush is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group. Cori Bush
Speaker details
Total words: 1,708
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.7% percentile 2.7% BS Score16 analyzed videos1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst