Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video49.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Combat Antisemitism Movement results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (12,688 of 45,123 speakers). This Combat Antisemitism Movement is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Combat Antisemitism Movement
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠72%Combat Antisemitism Movement (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 49.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.9% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos