Speaker summary
ā 29%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cliff Albright results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 4 hits. Analysis detected 8 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of ā 7% (42,069 of 45,145 speakers). This Cliff Albright is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Cliff Albright
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%Paul Heideman1%
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Conor Heffernan1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Katy Longshore1%
ā 7%Cliff Albright (selected)8%
ā 100%291 Brewhouse100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%2035 Initiative100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
ā 100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 54
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.8% percentile
7.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos54 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.1%7.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos