Speaker summary
73% 30 analyzed articles/videos 1,464.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Wright results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Self-Serving Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 401.791 hits . Analysis detected 2,464.7 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,464.667 analyzed words across 30 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 3% (44,483 of 45,464 speakers). This Chris Wright is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group. Chris Wright
Speaker details
Total words: 1,464.667
Content count: 30
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.2% percentile 4.3% BS Score30 analyzed videos1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 25.4% 25.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 18.7% 18.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
NTD 100% 7/24/2026, 5:30:17 PM