Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Charles results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Halo Effect, and Loss Aversion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 662.21 faulty-reasoning hits from 355 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (42,554 of 45,135 speakers). This Chris Charles is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group.
Chris Charles
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠6%Chris Charles (selected)7%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 355
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751005.7% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos355 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.5%17.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos