Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video84 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CHERYL REEVE results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 52.4% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 113 faulty-reasoning hits from 84 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 33.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (20,631 of 45,494 speakers). This CHERYL REEVE is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
CHERYL REEVE
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠55%CHERYL REEVE (selected)34%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 84
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.7% percentile
33.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos84 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 52.4%52.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 13.1%13.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 52.4%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 9.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos