Speaker summary
⁠59%2 analyzed articles/videos45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 37.8% saturation with 17 hits. Analysis detected 34 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 37.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (18,600 of 45,145 speakers). This Charles is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Charles
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠59%Charles (selected)38%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510058.8% percentile
37.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 37.8%37.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 37.8%37.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 37.8%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 37.8%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos