Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video67.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cathy Cockrum Dean results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 185.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 67.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (7,856 of 45,051 speakers). This Cathy Cockrum Dean is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
Cathy Cockrum Dean
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠83%Cathy Cockrum Dean (selected)75%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 67.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510082.6% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos67.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos