Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video73.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cathleen MacCaul results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 69.1% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 148.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 73.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (17,439 of 45,112 speakers). This Cathleen MacCaul is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Cathleen MacCaul
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠62%Cathleen MacCaul (selected)41%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 73.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.3% percentile
40.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos73.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 69.1%69.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 44.1%44.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 69.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 44.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos