Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video46.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carrie Borgenicht results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Halo Effect, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 56.4% saturation with 29.625 hits. Analysis detected 78.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (24,801 of 43,769 speakers). This Carrie Borgenicht is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Carrie Borgenicht
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠44%Carrie Borgenicht (selected)26%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 46.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.3% percentile
25.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos46.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 56.4%56.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.1%17.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 18.6%18.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Loss Aversion: Speaker 56.4%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 0.0%Loss AversionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos