Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Capt. Ted Leach results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) and Unattributed Quote, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 76.9% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 30 faulty-reasoning hits from 26 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (18,340 of 45,134 speakers). This Capt. Ted Leach is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Capt. Ted Leach
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠60%Capt. Ted Leach (selected)39%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 26
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.4% percentile
38.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos26 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 76.9%76.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 15.4%15.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 76.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos