Speaker summary
⁠86%2 analyzed articles/videos284.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caitlin Vogus results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 48.5% saturation with 138.012 hits. Analysis detected 851.997 faulty-reasoning hits from 284.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (28,659 of 45,123 speakers). This Caitlin Vogus is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Caitlin Vogus
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠37%Caitlin Vogus (selected)22%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 284.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.5% percentile
21.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos284.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 48.5%48.5%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 41.9%41.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 30.5%30.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 35.3%35.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Slippery Slope: Speaker 48.5%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Speaker 41.9%, sitewide 1.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 35.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 30.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 2.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos