Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video61 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CAITLIN CLARK results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Blind-Spot Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 62.3% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 61 faulty-reasoning hits from 61 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (20,651 of 45,145 speakers). This CAITLIN CLARK is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
CAITLIN CLARK
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠55%CAITLIN CLARK (selected)34%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 61
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.3% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos61 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 62.3%62.3%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 19.7%19.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 62.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 19.2%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos