Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video128.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brooke Flammang results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 49.6% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 257.867 faulty-reasoning hits from 128.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (21,155 of 45,369 speakers). This Brooke Flammang is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Brooke Flammang
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠54%Brooke Flammang (selected)33%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 128.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
32.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos128.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 49.6%49.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 35.3%35.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 35.5%35.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 35.3%35.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 49.6%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 35.5%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 35.3%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 35.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos