Speaker summary
78%1 analyzed article/video138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bilal Baydoun results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 62.7% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 475.182 faulty-reasoning hits from 138 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (26,120 of 43,634 speakers). This Bilal Baydoun is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Bilal Baydoun
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
41%Bilal Baydoun (selected)24%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 138
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510040.1% percentile
23.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos138 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 62.7%62.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 18.6%18.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 42.3%42.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.1%9.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 62.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 42.3%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos