Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video80 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bev Craig results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 150 faulty-reasoning hits from 80 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (17,140 of 45,145 speakers). This Bev Craig is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
Bev Craig
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠62%Bev Craig (selected)42%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 80
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510062.0% percentile
41.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos80 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos