Speaker summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antony Szmierek results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Nature, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 92.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 166 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (35,696 of 45,692 speakers). This Antony Szmierek is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Antony Szmierek
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠22%Antony Szmierek (selected)14%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 166
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510021.9% percentile
13.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos166 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 28.3%28.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 14.2%14.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos