Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video161.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angela Allen-Bell results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and False Dilemma, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 61% saturation with 106.979 hits. Analysis detected 363.282 faulty-reasoning hits from 161.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (24,201 of 45,123 speakers). This Angela Allen-Bell is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Angela Allen-Bell
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠47%Angela Allen-Bell (selected)28%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 161.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.4% percentile
27.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos161.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 61.0%61.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 40.5%40.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 24.6%24.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.2%21.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.3%13.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Indoctrination: Speaker 61.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.5%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 6.0%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos