Speaker summary
84%1 analyzed article/video263.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andy Sheaffer results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 1,282.812 faulty-reasoning hits from 263.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14% and a BS Rank of 22% (35,222 of 45,145 speakers). This Andy Sheaffer is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Andy Sheaffer
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
22%Andy Sheaffer (selected)14%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 263.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510022.0% percentile
14.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos263.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.4%8.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.7%14.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 0.6%In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos