Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video46.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Allison Huffstutler results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, False Dilemma, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 34.3% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 70 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (25,685 of 45,120 speakers). This Allison Huffstutler is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Allison Huffstutler
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠44%Allison Huffstutler (selected)25%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 46.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.1% percentile
25.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos46.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 34.3%34.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.7%15.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos