Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video117.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alicia Tamayo results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Burden of Proof, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 249.881 faulty-reasoning hits from 117.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (28,461 of 44,169 speakers). This Alicia Tamayo is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Alicia Tamayo
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠36%Alicia Tamayo (selected)21%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 117.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510035.6% percentile
20.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos117.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 44.3%44.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 33.2%33.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 12.6%12.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.4%18.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 44.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 33.2%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 19.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 0.4%In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos