Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Silverman results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Circular Reasoning, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 54 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (7,810 of 45,145 speakers). This Adam Silverman is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Adam Silverman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠83%Adam Silverman (selected)75%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 24
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510082.7% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos24 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos