Keyword summary
54% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zahara Jolie Pitt results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 548 hits . Analysis detected 3,808 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,576 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 39% (32,425 of 53,057 keywords). This Zahara Jolie Pitt is better (less manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group. Zahara Jolie Pitt
Keyword details
Total words: 5,576
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst