Keyword summary
28% 1 analyzed article/video 514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yorktown Heights results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Bandwagon , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 386 hits . Analysis detected 1,183 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 69% (18,664 of 59,653 keywords). This Yorktown Heights is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Yorktown Heights
Keyword details
Total words: 2,056
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.7% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 18.8% 18.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst