Keyword summary
54% 1 analyzed article/video 527 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wwe Summerslam Night 2 results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hindsight Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 285 hits . Analysis detected 1,017 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 51% (29,334 of 59,653 keywords). This Wwe Summerslam Night 2 is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group. Wwe Summerslam Night 2
Keyword details
Total words: 2,108
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst