Keyword summary
34% 1 analyzed article/video 496 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wild Boars results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 124 hits . Analysis detected 955 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 55% (27,098 of 59,735 keywords). This Wild Boars is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group. Wild Boars
Keyword details
Total words: 1,984
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst