Keyword summary
68% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wells results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 1,087 hits . Analysis detected 6,882 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,372 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (43,375 of 57,989 keywords). This Wells is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Wells
Keyword details
Total words: 9,372
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst