Keyword summary
99% 1 analyzed article/video 650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Jordan Relations results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 135 hits . Analysis detected 1,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,950 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 70% (17,850 of 58,197 keywords). This US Jordan Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. US Jordan Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 1,950
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.3% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst