Keyword summary
75%2 analyzed articles/videos1,440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Forces results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 806 hits. Analysis detected 5,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,760 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 56% (25,314 of 57,549 keywords). This US Forces is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
US Forces
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
56%US Forces (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,760
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510056.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.2%5.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos