Keyword summary
51% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Universal School Meals results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,492 hits . Analysis detected 9,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,580 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (49,159 of 59,653 keywords). This Universal School Meals is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group. Universal School Meals
Keyword details
Total words: 14,580
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst