Keyword summary
75% 2 analyzed articles/videos 671 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Uber Eats results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 405 hits . Analysis detected 2,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,509 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 72% (16,772 of 59,653 keywords). This Uber Eats is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group. Uber Eats
Keyword details
Total words: 2,509
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.9% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 16.1% 16.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst