Keyword summary
7% 2 analyzed articles/videos 890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thrive City results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 239 hits . Analysis detected 1,998 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,844 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 4% (57,572 of 59,653 keywords). This Thrive City is better (less manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group. Thrive City
Keyword details
Total words: 7,844
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.5% percentile 0.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst