Keyword summary
⁠37%2 analyzed articles/videos2,180 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Comptroller Of Public Accounts results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 450 hits. Analysis detected 3,578 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,720 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (54,900 of 59,653 keywords). This Texas Comptroller Of Public Accounts is better (less manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Texas Comptroller Of Public Accounts
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 8,720
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

8% percentile
02550751008.0% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos