Keyword summary
53%1 analyzed article/video842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Test Environment results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 595 hits. Analysis detected 2,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 60% (24,415 of 59,653 keywords). This Test Environment is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Test Environment
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
60%Test Environment (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510059.1% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 17.7%17.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%No True Scotsman: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate