Keyword summary
10% 1 analyzed article/video 311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tan Suit results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Hindsight Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 100 hits . Analysis detected 284 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 62% (22,898 of 59,653 keywords). This Tan Suit is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. Tan Suit
Keyword details
Total words: 1,244
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst