Keyword summary
91% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supplemental Budget results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Loss Aversion , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 776 hits . Analysis detected 4,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,195 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 64% (21,033 of 58,015 keywords). This Supplemental Budget is worse (more manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group. Supplemental Budget
Keyword details
Total words: 4,195
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Straw Man: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst