Keyword summary
35% 17 analyzed articles/videos 11,681 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Super Pac results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 3,744 hits . Analysis detected 24,972 faulty-reasoning hits from 48,961 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 6% (56,527 of 59,653 keywords). This Super Pac is better (less manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group. Super Pac
Keyword details
Total words: 48,961
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.2% percentile 1.0% BS Score17 analyzed articles49K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst