Keyword summary
13% 1 analyzed article/video 1,108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strontium Isotopes results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 183 hits . Analysis detected 1,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (49,255 of 59,653 keywords). This Strontium Isotopes is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group. Strontium Isotopes
Keyword details
Total words: 4,432
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.4% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst