Keyword summary
35%4 analyzed articles/videos1,099 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spencer Levering results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 495 hits. Analysis detected 2,939 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,396 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 63% (22,140 of 59,653 keywords). This Spencer Levering is worse (more manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Spencer Levering
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
63%Spencer Levering (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,396
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510062.9% percentile
2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate