Keyword summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These South Seattle Emerald results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 1,214 hits . Analysis detected 4,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,388 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 65% (19,312 of 54,363 keywords). This South Seattle Emerald is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group. South Seattle Emerald
Keyword details
Total words: 5,388
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.5% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 22.5% 22.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.0% Straw Man: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst