Keyword summary
64% 1 analyzed article/video 565 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shenzhen New World results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof , Unattributed Quote , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 440 hits . Analysis detected 2,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 87% (7,603 of 55,683 keywords). This Shenzhen New World is worse (more manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group. Shenzhen New World
Keyword details
Total words: 2,260
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.3% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 19.5% 19.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Burden of Proof: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst