Keyword summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 475 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shell Energy Stadium results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 248 hits . Analysis detected 875 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 42% (34,930 of 59,751 keywords). This Shell Energy Stadium is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. Shell Energy Stadium
Keyword details
Total words: 1,900
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst