Keyword summary
25% 1 analyzed article/video 1,074 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sham Charities results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 175 hits . Analysis detected 1,568 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 19% (44,195 of 54,289 keywords). This Sham Charities is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group. Sham Charities
Keyword details
Total words: 4,296
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.6% Red Herring: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst